Friday, October 15, 2021

A federal judge has ordered the termination of Dakar; The current enrollment is now secure

HOUSTON – A federal judge in Texas on Friday ordered the end of an Obama-era program that stopped the deportation of some immigrants to the United States as children.

U.S. District Judge Andrew Henen ruled in favor of Texas and eight other conservative states that have filed lawsuits to close the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which provides limited protection to about 5,050,000 people. People who are already registered will not lose protection, but Hanen is preventing new applications from being processed.

Henen’s decision limits the immediate power of President Joe Biden, who promised during his campaign to defend the DACA, to keep the program or something similar right. A Texas federal judge has handed down a second verdict after closing Biden’s immigration plan, following a court banning Biden’s 100-day stay on most deportations.

Biden has proposed legislation that would grant citizenship to an estimated 11 million people living in the United States without approval. He instructed agencies to try to save the program.

Read Also:  A federal judge has ordered the termination of Dakar; The current enrollment is now secure

It depends on Congress, the judge said

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Henen said Congress must work if America wants to provide protection in Dhaka to recipients commonly known as “dreamers.”

Hanen’s verdict comes after a nearly three-hour court hearing on Decker’s fate on Dec. 22.

The states argued that former President Barack Obama never had the right to create a program like Daka because it blocked Congress. States argued that the program drains their educational and healthcare resources.

FILE – In Washington, June 18, 2020, after then-President Donald Trump rejected efforts to end the legal protection of young immigrants after supporters in front of the Supreme Court celebrated the pending action for the arrival of childhood.

In addition to Texas, there were Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, South Carolina, and West Virginia – all of which had Republican governors or state attorney generals.

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund and the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, which defended the program on behalf of a group of called recipients, argued that Obama had the power to establish the DACA and that states did not have the position to sue them because the program did no harm. .

The rules are predetermined

Hannan rejected Texas’ application in 2018 to close the program through an initial order. However, in anticipation of his latest ruling, Hanen said in 2018 that he believed the Dhaka law was probably as constitutional as it was statutory.

“If the nation really wants to take a call, it should say it on behalf of Congress,” Henen wrote.

Henen ruled in 2015 that Obama could not establish any program to extend the protection called for or to protect their parents.

Although DACA is often described as a program for young immigrants, many recipients come to the United States for a decade or more without permission or visa. The Liberal Center for American Progress says at least one parent of about 254,000 children is dependent on DACA. Some recipient grandparents.

The U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that former President Donald Trump’s attempt to end Daka in 2017 was illegal. A New York judge ordered the Trump administration in December to reinstate the program enacted by Obama.


Nation World News Desk
Nation World News is the fastest emerging news website covering all the latest news, world’s top stories, science news entertainment sports cricket’s latest discoveries, new technology gadgets, politics news, and more.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -