The Alianza Lima cadre once again raised their voice in protest before the FPF, for which they sent a letter to reporters after responding to the letter sent on March 8. The blue and white team showed their surprise because of some points in the said letter.
Below is a notarized letter from Alianza Lima to FPF;
“We have received your response to our letter of March 8. In it we inform you that you will accept the television company that has a contract with you for the game on Saturday 11, as indeed it has been done,” says the intimate team.
In addition, he adds that “you should also know that we do this only out of respect for our fans, for the sake of the public from all over the country, who want to see our horses, and to avoid further damage to the club’s game; but we have declared that you have committed an abuse of power, and that we will be held accountable in a timely manner.
“In their new letter they state that “one of the goals and objectives established by the FPF …”. It is a shame, but it must be corrected: the Peruvian Football Federation (FPF) is not a legislative chamber. To state its objective or goal is to write the regulations. It can be considered as the most to be one of its functions”.
The blue and white team also means “because of this confusion, you will use countless legal citations to confirm” that the FPF has the ability to change the rules of local championships and tournaments. Indeed, the quotations are correct; What we state in our letter of March 8 is that you cannot give immediate effect to the changes proposed for the tournament that has already begun, because the possibility of producing or producing losses and benefits for some clubs. others agree, adding that it is an unjust decision. The whole.
“The proof of what was said by you in your letter is irrefutably given at this time: you affirm that article 3 of the Rules of the League 1 Betsson 2023 allows you to make a change of immediate application. Yes, 3.6 of the regulations, which are allowed regulations, but this requires that an extraordinary situation it will be proved: “due to exceptional circumstances, health cases or national circumstances”. In this understanding, what is the extraordinary situation that allows the Regulation to be changed urgently?, they point out. to go out
“The full documentation of what was said, you did not describe (nor will you tell) the legal basis that supports the rescheduling of our party on February 25, which confirms that the decision was based solely on the exercise of an arbitrary position. dominate.”
Finally, they say “it seems superfluous for us to applaud our respect for the club and our fans. Don’t forget: these are the only reasons to comply with your orders, despite the fact that they have no legal ones”. or ethical foundations”.
