Jhajjar police yesterday (11 May 2021) from the United Kisan Morcha leader Yogendra Yadav for 2 hours in a rape case with a Bengal woman at the Tikari Border farmers demonstration site Questioned. Police said they had sent notices to Yogita and Kavita, besides Yogendra Yadav. Of these, Yogita reached the police station to answer the questions of the police. DSP Pawan has told that the accused Anup and Anil are being searched by constituting the SIT.
Please tell that a 25-year-old woman from Bengal died due to Kovid on 30 April. About a week later, on May 8, his father told the police that his daughter was sexually assaulted at the protest site. In this case, the police have registered a case against 6 people under various sections.
The father of the deceased told the story from 1 to 30 April
Swati Goyal Sharma’s published on Swarajya magazine’s online portal according to the report, The father of the deceased victim is also associated with the trade union. He is a member of the Appreciation for Protection of Democratic Rights institution in Hooghly. His daughter was an artist and designer.
The report quoted the victim’s father as saying that on April 1, 6 people came to Bengal claiming themselves to be members of the Farmers Social Army and met local activists. These included Anup Singh, Anil Malik, Ankur Sangwan, Kavita Arya. Apart from these, Jagdish Brar had also reached with the Wrestling Farmers Union. Yogita Suhag, who calls herself an independent actor, also came. All these people were campaigning on behalf of the United Kisan Morcha.
On April 4, the aggrieved father-daughter met the group in Hooghly. During this time, the girl expressed her desire to go with him and join the performance. The father initially refuses, but later agrees. A few days later, she left Howrah station from Delhi with the peasant leaders. The father told Anil during this time that he has to take care of his daughter like a sister. At the same time, the girl’s mother told Anil to take care of her daughter at all times and protect her.
What happened to the victim in Delhi?
These people reached Delhi on 12 April. The girl was new in Delhi, so she did not know much about here. He was placed in the tents of Anil, Ankur and Anoop. On April 14, the girl told her father that she was harassed on the train. Anil came close to him in the train. Kissed her forcibly But he protested and told them not to do all this again.
In a conversation with the father, the girl was terrified that Anil and Anoop are not good people. After this, the father told him that he should go and stay in the women’s tent. On 16 April, he told his father that he had told all the things to Jagdish and Yogita and Yogita had also made a video of him.
On the same day, the victim also informed her father that blood had come from her urine. The father panicked and asked him to go to the doctor. Also asked to shift to another tent. On April 17, when the girl’s father spoke to Yogita, she was told that two lawyers named Chitwan and Amit Sangwan were looking into the case. With the help of some Himmat Singh and Jagdish, this matter will go to the leaders of the Farmers Social Army – Yogita gave this assurance to the girl’s father.
After this, the girl was shifted to a tent made in pillar number 774, where there were other women. A few days later the girl told that she had menstruation and now she is relaxed. According to the father, when he asked the daughter what was happy about it, she said, “You men will not understand.” It was only after this conversation that the girl’s father understood that something bad had happened to his daughter.
Health began to deteriorate from 21 April
On 21 April, the girl got fever and then loose motion and vomiting. Later, he was taken to the medical camp on the border border, but the condition did not improve. She continued to cough badly and slowly began to have trouble breathing as well. The distraught father spoke to the doctor, Avik Shah, associated with the Jai Kisan movement in Kolkata knowing the condition of the daughter, and sought medical help from her.
The matter reached Yogendra Yadav on 24 April
The case reached Yogendra Yadav on 24 April. He spoke to the victim on the phone and asked Dr. Watts to provide her with medical help. On 25 April, when Anil and Anoop got to know about all this, then they started taking the girl from Tikri. The father was told that he should bring him to Bengal? However, in this situation, the father asked him to give him immediate treatment in Tikri. But they left for Bengal in the car.
The victim’s father contacted Dr. Vats, who later spoke to Yogendra Yadav. When Yadav spoke to Anil, he told that he had crossed Agra. However, when the location was asked, it turned out to be Hansi in Haryana. Yadav immediately asked him to bring the girl back. Also warned that if this does not happen, they will tell the police.
According to the woman’s father, it was clearly an attempt to kidnap her girl. But she was brought to tick on 25 April. Later on 26 April, a committee took him to PGI Hospital, where he was admitted to a private hospital when he was not being treated. There she turned out to be Kovid positive.
The father of the girl reached Delhi on 29 April
As soon as the father came to know about the deteriorating condition of his daughter, he reached Delhi on 29 March. The daughter told him all the things and said, “We have done a bad job.” The report quoted the father as saying, “I started to understand why she was so happy with her menstrual period and why she was bleeding with urine.” He asked me to punish Anil and Anup. He also said that the farmer movement should not be harmed. “
Pressure on father made to say nothing in front of police
After the death of the girl on April 30, the father was pressurized to tell the police that the death was caused by Kovid. If this is not done, the dead body of the daughter will not be able to be taken. He told in a statement how the death occurred. However, after the cremation, he kept talking about it and he learned the most about what happened to his daughter. Finally, on 8 May, there was a complaint in this regard and this misdeed occurred in the midst of the peasant movement.