Statements from the National Palace about a general withdrawal calmed the concerns of those who created the expectation of re-election. It has been a hindrance to them, all these years. This matter is consistent when on the 6th of this month it is 113 years since Francisco I Madero launched his San Luis Plan whose basic principle is Effective Voting not Reelection. But in those shadows that the opponents hide, they lose sight of the real truth of their concerns: their return to power, which means, a re-election of a system that has destroyed Mexico. The hypocrisy that has governed for decades is that new governments are appointed but the essence of the system is the same. The non-reelection proposed by Madero is not only for the Porfirio system but for Porfirio Diaz himself. The PRI and its predecessors wanted to go overboard by appointing new governments, but they were re-elected within the same structure until their end came.
THE PRESENT LAWS RESTORE THE SAME PRIEST SYSTEM
The permanent re-election of a system that lasted almost a hundred years established a whole legal project that revalued its presence. Hence the many problems that exist today in the application of laws. Those same rules are reproduced in many states. A new law from the current government proposed within the environment of similar laws but from last year, clashes and thrown. If the opposition rejects the changes proposed by the government, it is because it preserves the same system to use it again. An old trick. If we go back to the second decade of the twentieth century, when Madero was killed, we can see that the changes that he proposed and that Emiliano Zapata treacherously demanded of him in the Plan de Ayala, were against the Porfirista laws. the killing was intended to preserve the old system. The Constitution proposed by Venustiano Carranza saved part of the revolutionary struggle. Although it is a document in which the small remnants of the Porfiirista period are subject, although the revolutionary constituent canceled many conservative proposals.
NO MAXIMUM CHIEF, GUIDE, OR CACIQUE WILL BE AMLO, ACCORDING TO THE COMMITMENT
The maximato used by Plutarco Eías Calles has applied to some regimes afterward. Lázaro Cárdenas stopped that exercise by sending him abroad. That is something unprecedented in a system because everything that arises comes from the same source. However, blindfolded by the man, they try to manage alone in their environment when everyone knows that is not the case. There were many clashes and in the case of Cárdenas, he was sent outside, to the province, so that he would not continue to influence with his presence and he wandered among the states, Sonora among them. But other governments are more abrupt. This is the case of Zedillo, who removed the presence of the one who elected him, Salinas de Gortari, and arrested his brother Raúl who was accused of inciting the murder of Francisco Ruiz Massieu. AMLO’s message, which was repeated several times, was intended to calm all the words that put Claudia Sheinbaum as his standard bearer, due to the almost certain fact that he could rise to the presidency. The retirement of anyone who takes power this time will be personally final, the president said. But let’s not forget that he is the architect who created 4T. We need to see what change the winner will give to change the original. We see that the phrase used by Calles is not repeated: