LOS ANGELES—The Los Angeles City Council today temporarily approved an ordinance that would prohibit protests within 300 feet of a target’s residence, protesting the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate late last month. A policy developed after volunteer workers showed up at the homes of two council members.
The ordinance received 12 yes votes, with Councilwoman Nitya Raman and Councilman Mike Bonin casting dissenting votes. The ordinance required unanimous approval upon its first reading, and will be held until next week, when it will need 12 yes votes to pass.
Ordinances generally require a simple majority upon second reading, but this ordinance includes an immediate clause to take effect immediately after publication. When urgency clauses are included, the ordinance requires approval from three-quarters of the city council.
The proposal to request an ordinance was introduced on 31 August by Council President Nuri Martinez and Councilman Mitch O’Farrell.
Speaking from City Hall on Monday during an unrelated news conference, Mayor Eric Garcetti similarly said he thinks it is important to protect the rights of private citizens, including neighbors of public officials and those who live with public officials. He said some of the “darkest chapters” in American history include people targeting private homes.
Protesters from Sunrise Movement Los Angeles, Black Lives Matter-Los Angeles, Los Angeles Tenants Union, People’s City Council, Street Watch Los Angeles, Keytown for All, and J-Town Action protest the ordinance by pots and pans outside Martinez’s home Exhibited. And speaking through bullhorns early Tuesday. It appears that some of the protesters, who stood on the sidewalk in front of Martinez’s driveway, were in violation of current city laws, which prohibit “targeted demonstrations at or about a private residence” that are within 100 feet. are within range. the address.
On August 28, an anti-vaccine mandate demonstrator at a Santa Monica rally shared the addresses of council members and encouraged people to go to their homes, if they voted yes on an ordinance, in most indoor public. At least partial proof of vaccination will be required prior to entry. spaces in the city.
“We have a week to stop [vaccination] Passport… If it’s unanimous, we’re lost. Sharpen your knives, get your guns, get your food now,” said the protester, holding a sign with the home addresses of council members.
“…we find out who voted yes and you show up at their house. We need to scare these people.”
After the rally, demonstrators, including governor-recall candidate David Alexander Bramante, demonstrated at the homes of Martinez and O’Farrell.
Martinez said, “There was a group of people at my door, knocking on my door, banging on my windows, harassing my neighbors, talking obscenely in my daughter’s bedroom, and was yelling at the bullhorn asking me to come out and put my life in danger.” said before the vote
“Members, frankly, I’ve done the whole thing. I’ve finished the threats… I’m ready to put an end to it.”
Martinez said those who want to oppose elected officials should go to their offices, not their homes.
“None of our employees, any member of our family should be treated like this. My address and my house are not public places for you to come and protest,” she said.
Raman gave the only dissenting vote on the proposal to develop the ordinance, saying that the city should focus on implementing its existing law rather than adding an ordinance that “would have exactly the same problems in its design and its enforcement.” “
Bonin voted for a proposal requesting an ordinance but expressed concern that the city needed to focus on enforcement of existing laws.
Neither Raman nor Bonin spoke before dissenting on Tuesday.
Several people called in a council meeting to oppose the ordinance, calling it a violation of First Amendment rights. Rikki Sergienko of the People’s City Council said he would sue the city if the ordinance took effect.
The draft ordinance states that a person who is “aggrieved” by violators of the ordinance can sue for damages. Violators may also face civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation.
This News Originally From – The Epoch Times