LOS ANGELES—With one member withholding its vote, the Los Angeles City Council was forced on September 29 to delay a week in deciding on a proposed ordinance that would require people to enter multiple indoor public spaces. Must show proof of complete COVID-19 vaccination before .
Councilman Joe Buscano called for the city council’s rule to prevent unanimous consent, effectively preventing the council from voting on the ordinance upon its first reading. Ordinances that do not receive unanimous approval on their first reading must be returned for a second vote.
The council will consider the ordinance next week, when it needs only eight votes to be passed, or 12 votes to pass with immediate effect, allowing it to take effect immediately, rather than one month from publication.
Voted 13-0 on 11 August to request an ordinance by the city’s counsel, a majority of council members expressed support for the measure which requires proof of vaccination before entering many indoor public spaces. Will be
If passed, indoor public spaces covered under the ordinance would be required to display advisory notices beginning October 21 alerting customers to the need for vaccinations, effective November 4. This ordinance will apply to establishments that serve food or beverages, gyms and fitness venues, entertainment and entertainment venues, movie theatres, shopping centers and personal care establishments.
Retail establishments including kirana stores and pharmacies are not included in the draft ordinance.
“We want it to be sensitive to the fact that these are essential services for the people. We cannot limit people from buying their groceries or going to the doctor’s office or getting gas or refueling in their vehicle,” Council President Nuri Martinez said Wednesday morning. “So there are a lot of retail locations and businesses that we didn’t pay attention to.”
The chief legislative analyst told council members on Wednesday that the city has not yet chosen a department to implement the ordinance, but it has identified the building and security department as the most relevant. But that department does not have the staff to enforce the law. Enforcement of compliance will begin on November 29, and businesses that violate the ordinance will be issued a $1,000 fine for a second violation, a $2,000 fine for a third violation, and $5,000 for a fourth violation.
Buscaino said on Wednesday he would not support the ordinance, adding that there is no enforcement measure. He also expressed concern that the ordinance is not in line with the county’s requirement for proof of vaccination, which does not include restaurants and some other places.
included in the city’s proposal
Several council members expressed concern about details in the ordinance, including a lack of enforcement, but noted that it was imperative that the requirement take effect quickly, and the details could be decided later.
“All those concerns being said, we cannot delay one more day. We need to move forward with an ordinance that is going to protect people from their fellow citizens who are choosing not to vaccinate,” said Councilman Paul Krekorian.
People will be exempt from the mandate if they have medical conditions that restrict their ability to vaccinate or have “honestly held religious beliefs,” which will be reviewed by the location the person is attempting to enter. Those who are exempted will be able to use the outdoor areas of
Location, but if unavailable, they may be allowed to enter the indoor area by providing proof of a negative COVID-19 test.
The ordinance would also require people to show proof of vaccination or a negative COVID-19 test to attend outdoor events with 5,000 or more people, which would be stricter than Los Angeles County’s requirement, which would allow 10,000 or more people. Also applies to outdoor events.
“The stakes are high, and if you want to have fun, go to a bar, dine at a restaurant with your family, you’ll need proof of vaccination to do that,” Martinez said ahead of Wednesday’s vote. said. .
The ordinance would be similar to policies in West Hollywood, New York and San Francisco. West Hollywood’s policy to require adult patrons entering many indoor businesses to present proof of at least partial vaccination is in effect from October 7, with a full vaccination requirement beginning November 4.
Los Angeles County’s vaccination requirement only applies to employees and patrons of the indoor parts of bars, breweries, wineries, and distilleries. That rule also requires at least partial immunization from 7 October, with full immunization required by 4 November.
Many called in a city council meeting to protest and support the need. Sean Osborne, who is on the executive committee of the Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County, said, “You have these fascist policies that you are trying to impose on people at a time when COVID cases are going down, and then But you’re still going to do that, you’re going to mandate things.”
Los Angeles County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer spoke Wednesday morning in response to those who think the requirements should be eased as cases decrease.
“The reality is that we are not back to normal. There are so many opportunities for the virus to spread and new forms of anxiety take hold,” Ferrer said. “Our pandemic history has told us that we make the best progress when we We actively take steps to reduce the spread of this virus until community transmission is low and vaccination coverage is very high.”
Others called for support for requiring vaccinations for indoor public space use, including one man who identified himself as a Council District 10 resident with a degree in biology from the California Institute of Technology.
“I speak in support of the proposed vaccination ordinance. It is clear, thoughtful, science-based, and has good provisions for medical and religious exemptions,” he said. will help reduce the strain on hospitals and healthcare
worker and save lives. “
Patricia Torres Bruno, senior vice president of public policy for the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, called to express the chamber’s concern that there would be no city-to-city uniformity.
“We believe a mandate is in order and we have advocated for statewide guidance. A statewide mandate would ensure the continued application and enforcement of guidance from one jurisdiction to another. Lacking statewide guidance, any local proposed ordinance will not take effect,” she said.
Buscaino said he supported the ordinance’s goal and believed everyone should get vaccinated, but added that he would only support an ordinance that was in line with the county’s requirements. He also expressed concern over businesses already struggling to make ends meet, making vaccine cards available to untrained workers to check.
While Los Angeles County is seeing a falling number of COVID-19 hospitalizations and other metrics, the pace of vaccinations has remained relatively steady, and Ferrer warned Tuesday that the pandemic will only end if that pace picks up. Will happen.
As of September 23, 77 percent of eligible county residents aged 12 and older had received at least one dose of the vaccine, and 69 percent were fully vaccinated.
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), fully vaccinated people can still contract COVID-19 and transmit it to others, although they may develop symptoms, be hospitalized, or contract the virus. The chances of dying are very less.
There is some evidence that people who are fully vaccinated will spread the more contagious delta version of the virus for a shorter period of time, the CDC says.
This News Originally From – The Epoch Times