Friday, September 17, 2021

Manchin rejects Sanders’ $3.5 trillion budget in Op-Ed, jeopardizing his future

News Analysis

in a Opinion Draft For the Wall Street Journal, Senator Joe Manchin (DW.Va.) publicly opposed Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)’s broad budget resolution. Manchin’s opposition puts the bill-President Biden considers it to be part of his “rebuild a better” agenda-in serious danger of failing in the Senate.

On the eve of the Senate’s August recess, the budget resolution was submitted to the House of Representatives. This is one of the most ambitious and influential legislation since the New Deal. Some of its provisions include billions of dollars in funding for millions of illegal aliens to obtain citizenship, government-paid childcare, preschool and community college education, federal housing funding, and what Sanders calls “extremely radical” Policies to push the United States away from fossil fuels and so on. In order to fund the $3.5 trillion plan, the Democratic Party will raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy to the highest levels in the world.

The House of Representatives convened an emergency meeting on August 24 to consider the resolution after weeks of deadlock between moderates and progressives in the House of Commons. To end this deadlock, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (California Democrat) reached an interim agreement with the moderates on the morning of the emergency meeting. That night, the Democratic Party voted unanimously and submitted the resolution to the relevant committee to draft legislation.

Now, both houses of the Democratic leadership are desperately working around the clock to complete the drafting of legislation in a way that appeals to both houses of Congress. Due to the continuing division of the House of Representatives, if the budget bill and the infrastructure bill passed by the Senate are to pass the House of Representatives, this must be completed before September 27.

To be passed in the Senate, the Democrats need to fully support the bill before it can be passed with a small number of votes of 51 to 50.

When Senator Kyrsten Sinema (Arizona Democrat) publicly expressed her opposition to the bill, this unity was first threatened. Regarding the House’s move to advance the resolution, the senator’s spokesperson said, “The proceedings in the U.S. House of Representatives will not affect Kyrsten’s view of what is best for our country-including the fact that she will not support the budget settlement bill. This cost 3.5 trillion U.S. dollars.”

Manchin also expressed concerns about legislation in the interview. Twitter But it wasn’t until Thursday that his column resolutely opposed the bill.

Manchin wrote: “Some people in Congress have a strange belief that there is an unlimited supply of funds to deal with any current or future crises, and that spending trillions of dollars will not have a negative impact on the future. I disagree. “

He criticized the reckless consumption of his colleagues, saying it was imposing a new “inflation tax” on all Americans.

He also discussed serious concerns about the national debt, which has swelled to far more than 28 trillion U.S. dollars. Manchin said that now is not the right time to make a resolution after the government has “spent more than $5 trillion in response to the coronavirus pandemic.”

He criticized his colleagues for being indifferent to this record expenditure: “Now, Democratic congressional leaders are proposing to pass the largest single expenditure bill in history, regardless of rising inflation, severe debt or the inevitability of future crises. Ignore our policies. The financial consequences of the choice will create a disastrous future for the next generation of Americans.”

He explained his reasons, saying that these funds should be used for real emergencies, such as the severe mutation of the CCP virus in the future, the Great Recession and other financial crises or major terrorist attacks.

“Another reason for the suspension,” Manchin wrote, is to “allow a complete report and analysis of the effects of trillions of dollars worth of bills on this generation and the next.” He said the Congressional Committee should take time to determine “What should we fund and what we simply cannot afford.”

In light of these concerns, Manchin wrote, “On the one hand, I will not support the $3.5 trillion bill, or any additional spending close to that level, if there is no clearer explanation of why Congress chose to ignore the impact of inflation and debt on the economy. Seriously affect existing government plans.”

Manchin concluded the article with this warning: “During a period of intense political and policy disagreement, it is very helpful for us to remember that members of Congress have sworn allegiance to this country and to its constitution, not to a certain political party. A strategic suspension of the proposed budget proposal. By drastically reducing the size of any possible settlement bill to a level that the United States can afford and need to spend, we can and will build a better and stronger country for all our families.”

Manchin’s opposition to the legislation has caused serious difficulties for Democratic leaders. Since the legislation is drafted through the budget coordination process, obstruction can be avoided and passed by a simple majority.

The Democratic Party has hardly such a simple majority, controlling 50 seats plus the vote of the vice president. But without the full support of Manchin and the cinema, the bill would easily lose 48-52.

If the Democratic Party hopes to pass this legislation, it is now vital that party leaders reach an agreement with these two moderates; since they oppose the price tag rather than the content of the bill, any such agreement may involve cutting tens of thousands from the bill. Billions of dollars in expenditures-this will undoubtedly anger progressives.

This is not the only challenge facing the Democrats, because they are still preparing for the upcoming partisan struggle to raise the debt ceiling, and Louisiana is asking the federal government to provide emergency assistance to deal with the aftermath of Hurricane Ida.

Currently, the congressional leadership is facing a deadlock on the president’s ambitious agenda.

Masooma Haq contributed to this report.

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times, focusing on the Democratic Party. He has a bachelor’s degree in philosophy from Clemson University and is a scholar of the Lyceum project.


This News Originally From – The Epoch Times

Manchin rejects Sanders’ $3.5 trillion budget in Op-Ed, jeopardizing his future
Nation World News Desk
Nation World News is the fastest emerging news website covering all the latest news, world’s top stories, science news entertainment sports cricket’s latest discoveries, new technology gadgets, politics news, and more.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -

Leave a Reply