in view of the situation Proposed parliamentary blockade by the Juntos por el Cambio (JXC) in retaliation for the pro-government offensive against the Supreme Court In the Political Decision Committee of Deputies, The Frente de Todos (FdT) asked the opposition coalition to withdraw from that position and attend an extraordinary session. In National Congress.
“We simultaneously make a firm call to the political and institutional responsibility of the national deputies for change to review the position expressed and cooperate in the treatment of the agenda,” the official legislators highlighted. .It is a statement.
Who presides over the activities of the impeachment committee? Carolina Gillard, What is it that is breaking the rest of the parliamentary agenda: Change for Change made the untimely decision not to participate in any debate to the extent that the Frente de Todos maintains the process before the court,
in the ruling party They regard this maneuver as “blackmail” in order to save the “Macrista court” and the alleged.lawand judicial Which practices against the leaders of Peronism.
The fact is that the Congress is already blocked by the ruling party from presenting the impeachment project and including it in the agenda of the special session.
Last December there were three sessions in which the Juntos por el Cambio lacked a quorum, including the session in which the body’s officers were to be re-elected, in which cecilia morrow To the head
For this reason, those in the ruling party say that even without the inclusion of impeachment projects on the extraordinary agenda, there was no guarantee that Together for Change would facilitate parliamentary work.
Meanwhile, the commission, chaired by Gillard, will begin at 11am this Thursday. In a lengthy process, in theory, it would seek to open indictments against the four members of the Supreme Court, presenting all the necessary evidence for the purpose.
However, even without including its potential allies, the Frente de Todos would reach the two-thirds vote count to be able to approve relegation in the lower house. Nor would it garner the necessary majority in the Senate to convict the accused magistrates.
in the first meeting 14 files seeking impeachment will be looked into against the Supreme Court. There were twelve until Tuesday, but two were added in the last hours: One against the President of the Court, the man from Santa Fe Horace Rosati, Presented by advocate and journalist Pablo Lonto, and another formally against four members of the Supreme Court diego sanchez,
There are four reasons that motivate impeachment requests against the Court. In the first place, four judges are questioned for a decision that benefited the city of Buenos Aires. Conflict over federal sharing of resources.
Secondly, the court has been accused of ruling that favored the Juntos por el Cambio (to the detriment of the Frente de Todos). Composition of the Judicial Council.
Finally, the impeachment requests that in the water mismanagement of social work and in a 2×1 regime that tried to benefit the oppressors of the last military dictatorship,
At the same time, Together for Change’s Interblock unites its representatives on the body and refines the strategy that will drive the debate In the impeachment committee.
By political mischief, he explained that he would call the Minister of National Economy, sergio massaso that he may whitewash his position in the court, a An obvious attempt to corner him on a troubling subject, both in terms of its management—given warnings from the business sector—and internally that of the Frente de Todos.