According to a new report from the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), the hasty online learning environment on students during the ongoing pandemic has accelerated the growth of a cancellation culture at US universities.
Relying on empirical data culled from student surveys as well as insights from teachers and higher education leaders across the country, the September 8 report “Creating a Culture of Free Expression in the Online Classroom” claims that virtual education has suddenly become a reality. The widespread adoption, free speech crisis on college campuses in this country, encouraged a limited diversity of perspectives and greater self-censorship among students.
“The lifeblood of the liberal arts is debate, dialectic, questioning and challenging,” ACTA President Michael Poliakoff said in a statement. ACTA describes itself as “an independent, non-profit organization dedicated to promoting academic excellence, academic freedom, and accountability in America’s colleges and universities.”
“Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, which has threatened the strength and even existence of many institutions, online education has moved ahead. We have seen that it can give us access to a lively exchange of ideas, but it also has the potential to eliminate the opportunity for the development of character and intelligence. “
The report comes after an ACTA/CollegePulse national survey of more than 2,100 college students in 2019 found that 61 percent restrain themselves from expressing opinions “on sensitive political topics in the classroom because of concerns.” [a] Professors may disagree with them” at least “sometimes.”
The fact that it is so easy to record remote classroom activities, including on social media, makes it easy to share content, and gives students a resource to study, the report said.
This can help students and others, but also creates problems, such as “providing an opportunity for partisans across the political spectrum to exploit digital records to advance an agenda that Which has nothing to do with learning.”
“Audio and video recordings speak directly to our passions and, as a result, can be more effective at inciting anger; and it is easier to misinterpret or give the wrong impression in conversation than in written communication because it happens so rapidly.” , “according to the report.
Higher education has not adapted well to the age of social media, “in which activists can draw negative attention to a university, faculty member, or student within minutes,” and schools are “rapid to engage with assertive activists.” are being compelled from,” the report said.
Activists wishing to tarnish the reputation of the university have an automatic advantage because academics and the schools in which they work are “very sensitive to prestige and prestige.”
“Today, universities live in mortal fear of a negative tweet going viral. The presidents, deans, and provosts have, at this point, learned a dangerous lesson: The easiest way to placate the crowd is to give it what they want—usually by shooting someone and condemning their approach. —even if it means betraying the original educational value,” the report said.
Faculty members can improve the environment by avoiding giving personal, partisan opinions, which often have the effect of making students feel less secure about sharing different perspectives, and “discuss social and political issues in those courses.” Avoids doing things that are not directly related to current events,” the report said.
This News Originally From – The Epoch Times