“Ignoring such guidelines increases the likelihood that a judge will interpret a law that is contrary to legislative significance, and may be more in line with the judge’s own intuitions and policy preferences,” he wrote in the Harvard Law Review in 2016, in response to a review of his book by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, now sitting in the Supreme Court.
” A judge’s work does not take place at the sublime level of the grand, unified theory, but on the basis of a good investigation, ” he asserted.
In 2018, Justice Katzmann won the majority opinion of the Second Circuit Court in Zarda v. Altitude Express wrote that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The following year, he writes for a unanimous panel of three judges, he in Trump v. Vance ruled that the president of the United States is not exempt from a subpoena by a state jury ordering a third party to produce non-privileged material in its investigation into potential. misdade.
The case concerns a subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, from the office of the district attorney in Manhattan, Cyrus R. Vance jr. The Court of Appeal Trump’s request rejected to block the lawsuit, which sought eight years of his personal and corporate tax returns.
Both the rulings of Zarda and Trump have been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In 2017, Judge Katzmann, a consensus builder, issued a rare disagreement when Second Circuit Court, which dominates a district court judge, told the United States in Watson that a U.S. citizen who held 1,273 days illegally is not entitled to sue. the government for damages because he did not file his claim in time.
Already as a boy he tried to involve himself in civic affairs. When he was 9, he wrote to President John F. Kennedy on behalf of members of the Seneca tribe who had lost their territory due to a flood control project. As a second-grader, he wrote in a letter to Mayor Robert F. Wagner Jr. complained about a problematic traffic light in his Queens area.