According to a new report, the NCAA spends on average more on male athletes than on female athletes, especially when it comes to “just a few championships” seen as sources of income.
A law firm hired by the NCAA to investigate equity issues has published a 153-page report. Tuesday night, which includes a series of recommendations to close the gap between all sporting events. This is the second report from the company since August 3rd. which recommended how to equalize men’s and women’s basketball tournaments.
The NCAA has implemented some of these, including allowing the women’s tournament to use the term “March Madness.”
“The same structural and cultural issues that affect Division I basketball permeate the NCAA and have influenced its relationship to other championships,” the report said. “The NCAA’s strong dependence on the money it receives from the distribution of NCAA income has put pressure on the NCAA to maximize that income and minimize costs so that more funds can be distributed to members.”
Tuesday’s report shows that spending on competitors in Division I and national championships, excluding basketball, was about $ 1,700 less for women than for men in 2018-19. The NCAA spent $ 4,285 for a male participant compared to $ 2,588 for a female participant.
The gap is even wider in six same-sex sports such as wrestling and beach volleyball – $ 2,229 more per student athlete in the men’s championships than the women’s.
The survey also found that sports and their championships are better suited for gender equality.
“We have seen that combining at least some of the men’s and women’s championships in a given sport allows for more coordinated planning, increases fairness in the goods and services, funds and resources provided at the championships, and eliminates or reduces differences between outward views. and feel the “tournaments” – the message says.
Another part of the report reveals that the NCAA does not have the infrastructure to reward equal sponsorship at all championships.
“The report identifies important recommendations that we will prioritize and streamline so that they can be implemented for meaningful change,” the NCAA Board of Governors said in a statement on the institution’s website.… “These changes may require changes in budgets and business models when assessing the balance between resources allocated to championships that generate revenue and resources for those who do not.”
The review was conducted by Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, which was hired in March after the NCAA was unable to provide similar amenities to teams in men’s and women’s Division I basketball tournaments. The situation escalated on social media amid player complaints and prompted an apology from NCAA executives. including President Mark Emmert.
Tuesday’s report also recommended:
– Establishment of a system for collecting and storing standardized data for all 90 championships, which will facilitate future reviews and audits of gender equality.
– Getting rid of gender modifiers when branding tournaments and championships.
– Increase the number of senior staff in the NCAA championship structure to improve oversight of gender equality.
– Conduct a “zero” budget for each championship over the next five years to ensure that gender differences are necessary, appropriate and fair.
A report from August 3 showed that there is a problem with personnel – there is more in men’s basketball than in women’s. The latest survey found that some sports, such as baseball and ice hockey, have more staff than softball and women’s hockey, although it found that women’s volleyball and soccer championships have more staff than men.
The report says that “there seems to be no formal or consistent definition” of the three categories the NCAA uses to address staffing issues for the championships – “fairness”, which means earning income or can generate income; “Growth” that can be profitable over time; and “steady,” or one that loses money.
“There remains little understanding among NCAA members and even among NCAA staff about how talent is allocated between championships,” the report said.
The law firm also said it was unable to make direct comparisons between championships because “The NCAA does not keep track of expenses, ticket sales, amenities, or other items in a standardized manner that would allow such analysis.”
Fan festivals were another topic that highlighted gender inequality, the report said. The female soccer fan festival is larger than the male one, but it is an exception. The firm said that men’s lacrosse and baseball festivals have more sponsors, music, and games than women’s festivals, and the NCAA spends more on them. The 2019 Baseball Fan Fest cost around $ 274,800, compared to the softball equivalent of $ 53,900.