Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Shifting state abortion laws causes confusion for patients, clinics

Abortion providers and patients have struggled on Friday to navigate the evolving legal landscape around abortion laws and access across the country since the U.S. Supreme Court Roe v. Wade overthrew last week.

In Florida, a law banning abortions after 15 weeks went into effect Friday, the day after a judge called it a violation of the state constitution and said he would sign an order temporarily next week block. The ban could have wider implications in the South, where Florida has wider access to the procedure than its neighbors.

Abortion rights were lost and recovered in Kentucky within days. A so-called trigger law that imposes an almost total ban on the procedure went into effect with the Supreme Court ruling, but a judge blocked the law Thursday, meaning the state’s only two abortion providers can resume patients see – for now.

In Texas, abortions resumed during the first six weeks of pregnancy at some clinics after a judge in Houston said patients have that right, at least until a new ban on virtually all abortions takes effect in the coming weeks. But the state has asked the Texas Supreme Court to block that order and allow prosecutors to now enforce a ban on abortion, adding to the uncertainty.

The legal dispute will almost certainly continue to wreak havoc for Americans seeking abortions in the near future, with court rulings that could improve access to the procedure at a moment’s notice and an influx of new patients from overwhelming providers outside the state.

Some of the cases involve trigger laws specifically designed to restrict abortion should Roe fall, while other laws pending the Supreme Court’s ruling have ceased and are now being enforced. Many of the legal challenges for abortion restrictions argue that their state’s constitution guarantees access to the procedure.

Read Also:  Attack on Press Freedom - Global Coalition on Media Freedom Condemns Protasevich's Arrest

Even when women travel outside states with abortion bans in place, they may have fewer options to end their pregnancies as the prospect of prosecution follows them.

Planned Parenthood of Montana stopped this week from providing medication abortions to patients living in states with bans in place, including South Dakota, Arkansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. The move reflects how seriously it takes the prospect of prosecution, even for abortion providers in states that have retained abortion rights.

Planned Parenthood North Central States, which offers the procedure in Minnesota, Iowa and Nebraska, tells its patients that they must both take pills in the regime in a state that allows abortions.

“There is a lot of confusion and concern that the providers may be in danger, and they are trying to limit their liability so that they can provide care to people who need it,” says Dr. Daniel Grossman, who leads the research group Advancing New Standards. in Reproductive Health at the University of California San Francisco.

Emily Bisek, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood North Central States, said that in an “unknown and murky” legal environment, they decided to tell patients that they should be in a state where it is legal to have the abortion. complete, which requires two pills to be taken. 24 to 48 hours apart. She said most patients from states with bans will opt for surgical abortions.

Read Also:  Journalists Settle Suite Over Mistreatment Covering Protests

The use of abortion pills has been the most common method of terminating a pregnancy since 2000, when the US Food and Drug Administration approved mifepristone – the main drug used in medication abortions. Taken together with misoprostol, a remedy that causes cramps that empty the uterus, it forms the abortion pill.

Access to the pills has become a key battle in abortion rights, with the Biden administration preparing to argue that states cannot ban a medication that has received FDA approval.

Kim Floren, who runs an abortion fund in South Dakota called the Justice Empowerment Network, said the development would further limit the choices women have and likely mean more people would travel to Colorado for an abortion.

“The purpose of these laws, in any case, is to scare people,” Floren said of states’ bans on abortions and telemedicine consultations for medication abortions. “The logistics of actually enforcing it are a nightmare, but they rely on the fact that people are going to be scared.”

A South Dakota law went into effect Friday that threatens a criminal punishment for anyone who prescribes abortion medication without a license from the South Dakota Board of Medical and Osteopathic Examiners.

Republican Gov. Kristi Noem, an ardent opponent of abortion, said in a statement that “doctors who knowingly violate the law and prescribe this medication to end a human life will be prosecuted.”

This article is republished from – Voa News – Read the – original article.

Nation World News Desk
Nation World News Desk
Nation World News is the fastest emerging news website covering all the latest news, world’s top stories, science news entertainment sports cricket’s latest discoveries, new technology gadgets, politics news, and more.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -