Saturday, October 1, 2022

Supreme Court overturns New York gun law

Supreme Court overturns New York gun law

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a restrictive gun law in New York in a major ruling for gun rights.

The judges’ 6-3 decision is expected to eventually allow more people to carry guns legally on the streets of the country’s largest cities – including New York, Los Angeles and Boston – and elsewhere. About a quarter of the U.S. population lives in states that are expected to be affected by the ruling, the Supreme Court’s first major arms decision in more than a decade.

The ruling comes as Congress is actively working on gun legislation following recent mass shootings in Texas, New York and California.

Judge Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority that the Constitution “protects an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”

In their decision, the judges rejected a New York law that requires people to demonstrate a specific need to carry a gun in order to obtain a license to carry one in public. The judges said the requirement violates the Second Amendment right to “hold and carry weapons.”

California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island all have similar laws that are likely to be challenged as a result of the ruling. The Biden administration urged judges to uphold New York’s law.

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. The decision comes at a time when gun violence that had already increased during the coronavirus pandemic has increased again.

In most of the country, gun owners have little trouble carrying their weapons legally in public. But it was harder to do in New York and the handful of states with similar laws. New York law, which has been in effect since 1913, states that to carry a concealed handgun in public, a person applying for a license must show “proper reason,” a specific need for the weapon. to wear.

The state issues unlimited licenses where a person can carry their rifle anywhere and limited licenses that allow a person to carry the weapon but only for specific purposes such as hunting and target shooting or to and from their place of business.

The Supreme Court last issued a major arms ruling in 2010. In that decision and a 2008 ruling, the judges established a nationwide right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. The question for the court this time was about wearing one outside the house.

The court has previously indicated that there is no problem with restrictions on the carrying of guns in “sensitive places” including government buildings and schools. It said the same thing about restricting criminals and the mentally ill from carrying guns.

The challenge to New York law was brought by the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, which describes itself as the country’s oldest firearms advocacy organization, and two men seeking an unlimited ability to carry guns outside their homes.

The court’s decision is somewhat out of step with public opinion. About half of voters in the 2020 presidential election said U.S. gun laws should be tightened, according to Associated Press VoteCast, a comprehensive voter survey. An additional third said laws should be kept as they are, while only about 1 in 10 said gun laws should be less stringent.

About 8 out of 10 Democratic voters said gun laws should be tightened, VoteCast showed. Among Republican voters, about half said laws should be kept as they are, while the remaining half are now divided between more and less strict.

This article is republished from – Voa News – Read the – original article.

Nation World News Desk
Nation World News Desk
Nation World News is the fastest emerging news website covering all the latest news, world’s top stories, science news entertainment sports cricket’s latest discoveries, new technology gadgets, politics news, and more.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -