Switzerland has refused to cooperate with the National Court to clarify who is behind Tsunami Democratic because, according to its opinion, its actions are part of “a political crime”. This is stated in the summary of the National Court, the mystery of which was raised last week, three years and five months after a possible investigation, which was directed by the head of the Central Court of the National Court of Directive 6, which on 2 September Promoter of the Tsunami Democratic Platform, active on 2019, which mobilized many citizens to protest against the Supreme Court decision of Catalan pro-independence leaders, published on October 14, 2019. It is estimated that the magistrate, Manuel García Castellón, allowed the Civil Guard to tap hundreds of phones, particularly those of ERC leaders, Juntes and those associated with Omnium. According to legal sources, the talks once again reveal the rivalry between the pro-independence leaders.
The National Court has been able to keep the investigation secret for so long, while waiting for letters from abroad asking for information on the Tsunami application and its funding, and requests from Switzerland, Canada, the United States and the Has been done According to what TV3 has advanced and ElNacional.cat confirmed this Thursday, the response given by Switzerland is very clear: the Swiss authorities, according to their law, consider that the airport and the tsunami protest in La Jonquera are such There are incidents that fit a crime of a political nature and not as terrorism or a criminal organization, as the investigation at the National Court began. Switzerland has also been asked for the data of current account holders in CIM Banque linked to Tsunami Democratico. Other countries do not provide any conclusive information.
In summary, for now, there is no final solution, where the judge specifies the people and crimes investigated, and that is why the prosecutor’s office has to roll up its sleeves and let the people decide what it ultimately Seeks to investigate, see case in courts where incidents occurred or requested their files, according to legal sources.
Allegation, without specifying
Of the long list of detectives, the only ones to have been definitively investigated are the seven defendants in the Volhov case, arrested in October 2020 and claimed by a National Court judge in summer 2021. They are: Oriol Solar Castanes, editor and general director of SOM; former ERC minister, Javier Vendrell; former CDC leader, David Maddy; the head of the Puigdemont office, Josep Luis Alay; computer scientist Jaume Kabani; Josep Campamajo and Marta Molina, as coordinators of mobilizations with groups such as the latter two CDR. The Secretary General of the ERC, Marta Rovira, has also been cited as a promoter of Tsunami from Switzerland, in collaboration with Solar, and with the approval of President Carles Puigdemont. rovira, but that has not been directly examined. For now, only Soler has appeared in the process at the National Court, while the rest are waiting for the judge to summon them or file a case against them.
Mosos and a network of computers
In one of the latest reports, the Civil Guard assured that the people being investigated in Volhov would be supported by agents of the Mossos de Escuadra, specifically three agents (he cites their names) to identify license plates. for, and for disguising, computer scientists to hide the tsunami’s call and origin. He also stressed on the cyber security measures taken by Campaggio and Cabani.
Police chasing victim
Recently, Oriol Solar asked the Constitutional Court (TC) to take preventive measures to lift the confidentiality of this investigation, which was opened by the National Court on October 17, 2019. Soler, through lawyer Bennett Salelas, is one of the investigators in the Volhov case. Those who appeared in the case initially denied and were corrected by the Appeals Chamber of the National Court. In TC’s letter, the lawyer assured: “Solar has the right to consider that he is being subjected to unjustified, ideological police and judicial harassment and possible investigation.” Now, with access to the case, he has been able to verify the investigation and the allegations, in addition to controversial conversations that have not yet come to light.
