Valencia informed the appeal The process was not admitted as a precautionary measure for the partial closure of Mestalla, namely Grada Mario Kempes Curva Nord. In this way, until today, on Sunday against Espanyol, he will make the first five games to close, while Valencia prepares his legal resources. In fact, this Thursday afternoon, Valencia sent another request for caution to the Appeals Committee itself, which had not denied the major request, but had rejected the request for caution, because there was no previous appeal from Valencia to the university. Summary of the sentence. And that recourse to the university and the new petition for caution have already been presented. According to sources in Valencia, the Appeal will respond to this on Friday.
He bases his opinion on the appeal of inadmissibility on the fact that He could not study the petition for caution in Valencia. It is not possible, because jurisprudence reveals to that Court that before Mestalla the club must present an appeal to govern the entire Competition. Therefore, what he states in brief in his Appeal is: “To disapprove the request for injunctive suspension requested by the representation of Valencia CF, SAD, naturally leaving the possibility of Valencia open to file before this appeal Committee within the term of appeal against the legally established. , contains”.
Appeal, in this sense, Valencia accepted the request to “send the whole package”. (which is only indicated in the sense in this resolution), already expected and brought forward to refer to the instance of the Appeals Committee. And with this document, Valencia has already taken the appropriate legal steps, that is, an appeal has been filed again against the entire Competition and, in parallel, a request for precautionary measures. In the event that the Appeal does not accept the caution, the Mestalla club will go to the TAD.
The Competition Committee approved the partial closure of Mestalla based on five games, among other reports TikTok and Twitter videos uploaded to the network by Real Madrid fans. As Radio Valencia Cadena SER revealed, these contents are those that have been brought to the Competition and those that have been seen to make their decision to punish Grada Mario Kempes with five match clauses.
The validity of the allegations presented to the Appeals Committee; although it is defended against these rejections and the sanction of the Competition. “There can be no doubt here. We are all against the desire to expandbut we also reject the accusation, which was made against all the fans of Valencia, that they did not deserve that description, although “we could not see the report until the afternoon, and therefore we could not enter. in fact.”
The legal services of Valencia contested before his appeal that they did not have the right to defend themselves because they were not previously informed of the evidence that had been sanctioned.
