In the case of Stornelli again absent the commission of President Carolina Gaillard (FDTR-Entre Ríos) will continue in any case with the process against the Supreme Court and the testimony of new guests invited to present before that body that opened the hearing at the church. the end of January on the actions of the investigating officers (Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz, Juan Carlos Maqueda and Ricardo Lorenzetti) who constitute the final judgment.
For this week, and according to the appropriate schedule, the Commission will continue with the presentation of the official secretariat of the Court and then outline the evidence, dividing them according to the main tables that are developed.
It is about the case of “2×1”, the repeal of the law of the Council of Magistrates and the restoration of the previous year of 2006, and the case of the co-participation of the city of Buenos Aires, as it is known.
In this context, in addition to Stornelli, the lawyer Juan Manuel Olima Espel (Secretary of the Institutions of the Attorney General of the Nation); Marcelo Mazzeo (lawyer), Sebastián Garay (Secretary of the original Trial Court) and Natalia Hilda Monayer (Member of the President of the Court, Horacio Rosatti).
The removal process from the Court, promoted by President Alberto Fernandez and twelve leaders, seeks to promote the accumulation of documents.
The decision to summon Stornell again was made last Tuesday, at the last meeting of the Committee on the Attack of the Deputies, which lasted more than seven hours.
On this occasion, the head of the Special Investigation of the AMIA Attack Unit and the radical Senator Mario Cimadevilla and the lawyers Sergio Nápoli and Gustavo Naveira spoke to the Judicial Clerks 4 and 7 of the Supreme Court.
Stornelli’s testimony was prompted to explain the reasons why he requested the closure of the case initiated to identify the alleged conversations between Silvio Robles (a relative of the president of the court Horacio Rosatti) and the Minister. Security and Justice of Buenos Aires, Marcelo D’Alessandro, who is leaving because of the dissemination of these interviews.
The proposal of the governing party was again referred to Stornelli for a vote in the committee and was approved by 16 votes against 14 of the JxC party.
“If he does not appear, the procedure will be to start the prosecution so that he can be introduced by public force,” Gaillard said at the last meeting of the commission, referring to the situation of the federal prosecutor.
And he added: “We think that Stornelli is going to come to testify in person. We are going to call him again,” announced the head of the Commission, rejecting the prosecutor’s proposal to testify in writing.
The notification for Stornell’s appearance in Congress on Wednesday, March 1, was conveyed to him, and there he recited the guidelines of the Commission on Impeachment, in which it is declared that attendance “is not optional.”
According to this regulation, an official of the Public Ministry cannot use the exception provided by the Criminal Procedure Code for officials who are authorized to declare in writing or from their work.
The proposal of the governing party was again referred to Stornelli for a vote in the committee and was approved by 16 votes against 14 of the JxC party.
Stornelli can be the second “absent” before the Impact Committee will repeat the practice that the prosecutor had already met before the subpoena to testify when the subpoena of the then federal judge Dolores, Alejo Ramos Padilla does not appear to identify him. framework of the so-called ‘D’Alessio causa’.
In that case, in which the false lawyer Marcelo D’Alessio was questioned about the repeated and unjust espionage – he was called the prosecutor by the judge, not by the Congress, and the subpoena as a defendant and not a witness.
After six calls, prosecutor Ramos Padilla appeared, who would eventually indict him for D’Alessi’s illegal partnership.
