New York ,
on the basis that in America Anyone can betray anyone and disqualify them for their quality Drug DealerSafety of Alfredo Beltran Leyva yjHere el chapo guzman tried to discredit the testimony of King Zambada and Sergio Villarreal, big one who will also be witnesses in this IThe case against Genaro Garcia Luna.
el mochomo Guilty King Zambada and Sergio Villarreal Barragán big one to testify against him “to take the government’s side.”
,Zambada He may have come to believe that I had something to do with his son’s murder,” he calculated. el mochomoin an appeal of his conviction, trying to explain the reason for testifying against him, saying that both witnesses “were drug addicts” and that big one He was “a corrupt cop and a sadistic serial killer.”
The appeal was denied, and Judge Richard Lyons of the Court of the District of Columbia upheld the life sentence. Alfredo Beltran Leyva
“in the standard America To accuse someone, they are too few,” Eduardo Balarezo—his defender—told Milenio when the process against García Luna began. mochomo But this also joaquin el chapo guzman, “If a witness points to a person, prosecutors will investigate and if it turns out that other witnesses talk about the same person, this will allow them to start a process.” The petitioner considers this to be “a very corrupt area” of the criminal system. America where “one can sit down to demean anyone” sometimes questioning the value given to testimony, especially for a profit-seeking criminal.
Concerned because of such “unacceptable statements” el mochomo The Cato Institute, the National Association of Criminal Lawyers, the Rutherford Institute among others joined in, calling the process against them unfair. On October 1, 2019, a “due process brief” was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States of America, where they appear to complain about a certain type of process used by prosecutors and security agencies. Let’s take the case.
“Should the Court resolve disputes over the appropriate standard for sentence corrections based on perjury and extrajudicial statements of cooperating witnesses?” Ask the members of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), who said they “have a direct interest in the outcome of this appeal because they are concerned about witness misidentification, false confessions, encouraging unreliable witnesses, Want to see structural and procedural changes needed to compensate for and prevent errors like Rumors and Evidence Unproven Forensics.”
The lawyers’ application was also rejected two weeks after it was filed on 15 October 2019.
as a test of Genaro Garcia LunaThe first witness will be called through a court filing on the night of Thursday, January 19, following arguments that begin on Monday, January 23, where Judge Brian Kogan outlines some of the rules he will follow during the hearing. will apply, it was verified that government aid workers are among King why big oneThe addition of former Nayarit prosecutor Edgar Vetia, who was sentenced in September 2019 in the same Brooklyn court, has struggled to receive favors from the North American justice system.
In his appearance as an opening witness in the trial against Joaquín Guzmán Loera, King Zambada Explained in detail several narco-operations of el chapo, But during cross-examination by the defense, he admitted to giving the bribe. Genaro Garcia Luna and Gabriele Regino, Undersecretary of Public Security for the Federal District (2000–2006).
He also said that on behalf of chapo guzman presented a $100,000 gift to Gen. Gilberto Toledano Sanchez and also doubled that for SIEDO commander Roberto Velasco, who was on the Zambada payroll Beltran Leyva.
allegation that he paid a bribe Garcia Moon It was taken with a lot of work by the defender of Zambada el chapo William Purpura after the prosecution objected to the question. As Judge Brian Cogan ordered the witness to answer, a 20-second long silence ensued, prompting the translator to joke: “Maybe the rats got his tongue”, which prompted Zambada to declare that he had Gave first 3 and then 5 million dollars. For the former Secretary of Public Safety.
Four years later, again, the brother of May Zambada will face the same question that ironically will now be asked by those who wanted to censor him in 2018.