“If it was offside it was not a penalty, but if it was enabled it was a penalty… because he hits me and I am ahead of him”. brutal honesty of alexander meiselThe author of the final play, which allowed the Argent-VAR-via to reach the tie at 54′ of ST, is commended. Till that moment he had all the numbers to become the man of the match.
But what was said: For Javier Cabrera that violation, which Judge Ramirez first overlooked and then confirmed when reviewing it, This denied Drill access to South American territory and allowed Bicho to take some from the South. Not a tip though…
The good intentions of the Argentines ran in their own incompetence. Because the people of Milito always held the ground to lead with the dominance of the ball and in PT they were more than the locals. However, he was not able to focus the target at any point: neither a through cross nor a shot from mid-range.
The other side was Banfield, who based on an enormous defensive fortitude – with Maisel Excellent in the cross – took advantage of the goalscoring nose of his right back, who was at the right place and time to capture a rebound and give it a shot. pasted next to it. Post. At the same time the match broke down and Drill began to take advantage of the places left by AAAJ. And if the energy was not in a hurry to finish in front of the target, the benefit would have been even bigger…
That’s why Banfield lamented for the occasion, for the bomb to Mago’s crossbar, a goal by Romero – was well canceled out… And above all for the lack of that good Machiel who arrived at the least indicated moment and who thanked La Paternal. However, the distribution did not fill either of the stomachs. There was a tie full of anger…
