Countless times there has been a champion team that didn’t deserve to win the title for the masses. How he played during the season was due, among other things, to his luck. And whenever this happens, the question arises: Do forms matter or should you win just like that? And later, debates arise, Like Carlos Navarro Montoya and Oscar Ruggieri did this Friday…
Former players, trying to define whether the champion is always the best, had an intense exchange. for monkey, What matters is form So the champion is not always the best; Whereas for Calzone, it’s the opposite…
“If 27 games are played in a championship, How can you become a champion by chance? Come on…”, said Ruggeri. And the monkey replied immediately: “No one talks about coincidences., Sometimes there are teams that are better than the team that are champions and they don’t come out as champions,
Along the same lines, Mono cited the Netherlands team at the 1974 World Cup as an example: “In that World Cup, Germany was the champion, But for me Holland was better. Because it had a shape and a method, which was better to my liking.” And so came Riggery’s response. “And the form of (champion) Germany overtook it”, Chief finished.
