Status: 07/01/2022 09:27 AM
The highest US court limits the environmental agency’s powers. Conservatives are happy and say climate decisions are in Congress. But experts warn: he has neither the time nor the expertise for this.
Even after the Supreme Court ruling, politicians in the United States can set limits on emissions of climate-damaging emissions from power plants. Restrictions on emissions associated with asthma or lung cancer also apply.
Still, the ruling by most conservative judges is seen as a defeat for US President Joe Biden and his plans to take a leading role in the fight against climate change. In the future, environmental agency EPA will no longer be able to regulate the economy without the consent of the US Congress when making decisions with major political implications.
Biden spoke of another disastrous decision aimed at taking the country back in time. Harvard Law School professor Jody Freeman told NBC television that the decision cuts into the government’s ability to act: “It undermines the environment agency’s ability to limit the CO2 emissions of power plants. But it also hurts the economy.” area that produces a quarter of the greenhouse gases.”
According to 19 Republican states, the Air Pollution Control Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency the power to regulate power plants on its own. you got it right
Climate issues are culture war issues
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey talks about the rule of law’s victory over PBS: “Who makes the big decisions of the day? The unelected bureaucrats who grab power don’t deserve it? Or should it be Congress? We think It’s Congress, because whether it’s New York, West Virginia, or Texas, that’s the only way to say it.”
But issues like climate protection have become issues of culture war in American society. Between maximum demands and a complete blockade, political solutions get out of the way – federal officials have stepped in so far.
“Congress has neither time nor expertise”
Blake Emerson of the University of California fears that following the Supreme Court ruling, the path could be blocked on issues of great social importance – not only for the EPA, but for other agencies as well. “Congress has neither the time nor the expertise to deal with all those social and economic problems,” says the scientist. Added to this is the “inability to make big compromises”.
There is no consensus on climate issues in America. In a first reaction to the decision, a UN representative called it a setback in the fight against climate change. One is already far from the climate protection goals of the Paris Agreement.
What does the Supreme Court’s decision on greenhouse gases mean?
Torsten Teichman, ARD Washington, July 1, 2022 at 8:49 am